Francesco, please let it go and stop this thread.
There are no more answers to give you on this subject...
-obj
Francesco Ongaro wrote on 11/30/2017 12:12 PM:
On 30/11/2017 16:44, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
Francesco Ongaro <[email protected]> hat am 30. November 2017 um
16:34 geschrieben:
You are right until you install something manually using dpkg.
Example:
http://download.proxmox.com/temp/pve-kernel-4.13.4-1-pve_4.13.4-26~vmxtest1_amd64.deb
for which I posted the hash sums on the channel where it was linked (the
forum[1]), which is - surprise - only available over TLS ;) this thread is
starting to get ridiculous..
1:
https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/pve-5-1-kvm-broken-on-old-cpus.37666/#post-185463
Hi Fabian,
I think that good security is implemented by overlapping multiple
controls while keeping the workflow simple and convenient for end
users.
When the cost is low it's often a no-brainer to implement a security
control.
Checking hashes manually is certainly doable, maybe not that convenient.
Sorry to sound ridiculous to you[1], my opinion is that being able to
communicate in a professional way is a nice skill to cultivate.
Best regards,
Francesco
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/SummerOfCode2013/StudentApplications/FabianG
"I am an advocat of free and open source software as well as meaningful
security solutions for everyone (such as accessable encrypted
communication methods and secure information storage)."
_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
