Murali Vilayannur wrote:
I agree with you that this stuff tends to be applied at different
places. I'm not sure that we intended the existing security options to
be global -- we didn't really discuss it. I think both of these things
are really intended to be per file system, even if we don't really
support that level of granularity yet.
Yup. I agree with you that they are meant to be per-file-system. I just
could not figure out a clean way to get to the f.s stuff from the BMI
layer. So it turned out to be a global option. :(
No worries.
We've got a working system for dealing with TCP connections, and I think
we should just stick with that mechanism.
>
Could you elaborate on this one? I dont think I understand that layer
completely yet.
I just meant that we have something that works. Sam suggests some
changes in subsequent email...
Rob
_______________________________________________
PVFS2-developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-developers
