Hi Rob, okey dokey. I can change it that will clean the code up :) Lets wait on it a bit. I havent done a whole lot of testing on this though.. Thanks, Murali
> can you push the HAVE_IGET5_LOCKED and HAVE_IGET4 tests down lower? > > what i mean is instead of: > > +#if defined(HAVE_IGET5_LOCKED) || defined(HAVE_IGET4) > + return PVFS2_SB(inode->i_sb)->root_handle == PVFS2_I(inode)->refn.handle; > +#else > + return PVFS2_SB(inode->i_sb)->root_handle == > pvfs2_ino_to_handle(inode->i_ino); > > would it make sense to move the macro tests to inside PVFS2_I ? or > would that cause larger problems with the code? > > ==rob > > -- > Rob Latham > Mathematics and Computer Science Division A215 0178 EA2D B059 8CDF > Argonne National Labs, IL USA B29D F333 664A 4280 315B > > _______________________________________________ PVFS2-developers mailing list [email protected] http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-developers
