On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 03:15:59PM -0400, Pete Wyckoff wrote: > What happened to automated testing? I found one compile problem and > what appears to be a pretty basic SEGV. Does the automated testing > not try the kernel interface? I'm not particularly annoyed at > finding these issues, just confused that they survived more than one > night.
We do only have a few configurations. We test the kernel interface on two machines (gil, fc5; and lain, debian/testing), mpi-io on another. How are you getting immediate completion? via CFLAGS or configure commands when you build, or is it something ib-specific? Definitely want to make sure we catch at least these regressions if they come back. > I'd be happy to see "build broke" messages go to the list every > night if it is easy to do that. Helps the guilty parties find bugs > faster. Hm. we could probably hack something up. There's also an RDF feed that might help? http://www.pvfs.org/pvfs2-nightly-builds/tinderbox2/all_trees.rdf.rdf ==rob -- Rob Latham Mathematics and Computer Science Division A215 0178 EA2D B059 8CDF Argonne National Labs, IL USA B29D F333 664A 4280 315B _______________________________________________ Pvfs2-developers mailing list [email protected] http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-developers
