On Jun 20, 2007, at 5:56 PM, Robert Latham wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 05:05:30PM -0500, Sam Lang wrote:
Let me know what you think.
My only concern is keeping ROMIO in sync. But what's one more
autoconf macro?
Its a PITA, is what it is. Rob and I talked about defining a new
PVFS_sys_create_layout function that would take a layout parameter,
leaving PVFS_sys_create untouched. If ROMIO is going to be one of
the users of the layout structure, that may not make a lot of sense
though, and it seems messy. With the latest PVFS FUSE port, maybe
there are more layers that have system interface deps, so we should
consider the potential impact there as well.
-sam
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division A215 0178 EA2D B059 8CDF
Argonne National Lab, IL USA B29D F333 664A 4280 315B
_______________________________________________
Pvfs2-developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-developers
