yep.. thats right :)
I think it should be safe to change the strrchr to strchr since it
seems to fix both the cases..
thanks,
Murali
On Jan 4, 2008 9:09 AM, Phil Carns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>In the case where you keep the logic that is currently in head but just
> >>change strrchr() to strchr(), what breaks in from the previously reported
> >>bug?
> >>
> >>I tried making that change and it looks like both cases work fine, but I
> >>may be missing something.
> >>
> >>Maybe it has something to do with the number of metadata servers? I am
> >>currently trying this with just one server.
> >
> >
> > I tried it again to remind myself. No segv, but the ls produces the
> > wrong answer:
> >
> > am30$ pvfs2-ls /pvfs/dir1/{0..9} | wc
> > Ignoring path /pvfs/dir1/8
> > Ignoring path /pvfs/dir1/9
> > 4009 4001 15179
> >
> > Should be 5000 files, and not say "Ignoring path".
> >
> > My setup is CVS head with 1 md+io server, and 1 client, tcp, plus removing
> > exactly one 'r' in sys-lookup.sm.
> >
>
> I think this answer is actually right, or at least as right as pvfs2-ls
> will allow :) pvfs2-ls.c is generating that "Ignoring..." message
> because it only allows you to list up to MAX_NUM_PATHS (which is set to
> 8) paths in a single command line invocation.
>
> -Phil
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pvfs2-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-developers
>
_______________________________________________
Pvfs2-developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-developers
