Hi Walt,
The acache (attribute cache) and ncache (name cache) are both based on
a generic timeout cache interface (tcache). It shouldn't be hard to
build up a capability cache using tcache, and will allow you to handle
timeouts for capabilities separate from the attributes, which I would
imagine you're going to want to do. There's a good chance Rob will
explode if you call it ccache though.
-sam
On Jul 1, 2008, at 10:56 AM, Walter Ligon wrote:
Hey all,
I'm not an expert on the a-cache and d-cache, so I wanted to get
some opinion from the group before diving into something. We are
going to need to manage capabilities on the client. My gut
intuition say they should go in the a-cache, but I don't know how a
big a deal it is to add an arbitrary sized blob into that. Would it
be better to create a new c-cache, or should it be easy enough to
add it to the a-cache?
Any hints would be appreciated.
Walt
_______________________________________________
Pvfs2-developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-developers
_______________________________________________
Pvfs2-developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-developers
