I don't have any changes to commit. I was actually playing with IBM's
compiler last time rather than Intel's, but regardless I didn't go far
enough with it to have any worthwhile changes.
PVFS used to compile with Intel's compiler in the not too distant past,
so I wouldn't think it is too far off now...
-Phil
Sam Lang wrote:
Hi Brad,
There's a bunch of gcc specific code in PVFS. I think Phil fixed a lot
of those cases recently to test the intel compiler on BG/P, but I'm not
sure if he committed those changes somewhere or just has a patch.
-sam
On Oct 2, 2008, at 2:13 PM, Bradley Settlemyer wrote:
Okay, I've got the issue now. PVFS will not build with Intel's
compiler. Oh well.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Bradley Settlemyer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Hello,
Is the latest release supposed to emit the following message:
DEP src/common/statecomp/parser.d
DEP src/common/statecomp/codegen.d
src/common/statecomp/../quickhash/quickhash.h(346): remark #193:
zero used for undefined preprocessing identifier
#if PVFS2_SIZEOF_VOIDP == 32
^
DEP src/common/misc/xattr-utils.d
SMC src/common/misc/void.c
Cheers,
Brad
_______________________________________________
Pvfs2-developers mailing list
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-developers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Pvfs2-developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-developers
_______________________________________________
Pvfs2-developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-developers
