Phil Carns wrote:
Rob Ross wrote:
Should we just replace pvfs2-ls with pvfs2-lsplus? -- Rob
I don't know of any reason not to. They are feature equivalent in terms
of command line arguments and output format.
-Phil
This is done now in CVS. I don't know if anyone needs it, but "make
install" creates a symlink for pvfs2-lsplus in case anyone has scripts
that use that use it explicitly.
-Phil
_______________________________________________
Pvfs2-developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-developers
