Yes with metadata and data in the same server process, the same
storage space (and databases) are used for storing metadata objects
and data objects. The advantages of using the same databases in the
same process are from coalescing and grouping of operations together.
That only happens when both metadata and I/O workloads occur together
on the file system.
Splitting the metadata and data really just boils down to putting the
bstreams in a separate path, specified probably in the config file.
What are your plans there?
-sam
On May 29, 2009, at 11:06 AM, Nicholas Mills wrote:
Sumit -
You're correct. Running two servers on the same node (one for data,
one for metadata) was the first thing we tried. In the end we
decided it would be better just to go ahead and add this
functionality directly to Trove. I'm not sure how significant the
performance hit would be from running two servers.
--Nick
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Sumit Narayan <[email protected]>
wrote:
This is pretty interesting.
I am just curious, can't this be done by running two servers on the
same node and treating one as metadata server and other as I/O server
- each having their own data space. It might add just a little extra
load on the node. I am guessing PVFS takes some advantage of putting
metadata and data on same node. Can someone fill me in as to what they
are.
Thanks,
Sumit.
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Sam Lang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> I don't see any problems with putting that in future releases once
its
> ready. It would be great if you could update the developers list
with your
> planned changes, and possibly send along patches as you have them,
allowing
> everyone to provide input, etc.
>
> -sam
>
> On May 28, 2009, at 5:10 PM, David Bonnie wrote:
>
>> Everyone -
>>
>> Nick and I are working at LANL this summer and one of our projects
>> involves modifying PVFS2 to use separate storage paths for
metadata versus
>> file data on a single PVFS2 server. The goal is to be able to
place the
>> metadata database files on faster drives (SSDs, RAM drives, etc)
to speed up
>> metadata operations while still being able to service data
requests from a
>> standard HDD. Does anyone forsee a problem with this being
pushed into the
>> main distribution once it is finished?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> - Dave
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pvfs2-developers mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-
developers
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pvfs2-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-developers
>
_______________________________________________
Pvfs2-developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-developers
_______________________________________________
Pvfs2-developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-developers