Unfortunately, I don't have concrete answers for the porting questions. There are no known endian issues, maybe other folks can comment if (and when) they used it on a big endian system.
As for the inline assembler bits not sure what scope of things would be involved when porting. We don't have any inline assembly I'm aware of. Michael On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Neale Ferguson <[email protected]>wrote: > The build from CVS was clean. Thanks. > > I am looking to port pvfs2 to System z (aka s390x). Are there any endian > issues I need worry about? Also, are there any low-level inline assembler > bits I should look at adding (e.g. Atomic locking, although with gcc 4.6 > __builtin_xxx should do the job nicely)? > > > Neale > > On 8/15/11 10:53 PM, "Michael Moore" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Neale, > > For 2.6.38 you should be able to use the Orange-Branch from CVS (the branch > OrangeFS releases come from). Directions for CVS checkout are at the bottom > of http://www.orangefs.org/support/. If you still have issues with the > kernel module let me know but I know it builds on Fedora 15 / 2.6.38.6-27. > In 2.6.39 and beyond there are more changes that break the kernel module > that don't have fixes committed yet. > >
_______________________________________________ Pvfs2-developers mailing list [email protected] http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-developers
