For the mix of jobs we do on our cluster here, having read caching would be wonderful, especially if it is a per-directory option. We run a lot of jobs that use fairly small input files over and over again, and pay a big price if we try to use PVFS for them.

--bob

On Oct 11, 2006, at 10:49 PM, Murali Vilayannur wrote:

Again, we do not do caching, although it won't be too hard to do so using the generic page cache functions *if* you don't mind stale data and terrible performance.


_______________________________________________
Pvfs2-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-users

Reply via email to