Right. Sorry, I missed the data locations! Becky -- Becky Ligon PVFS Developer Clemson University 864-656-3865
> In my understanding, the TCPBindSpecific operation would allow two servers > to operated on the same port, assuming they're on two different ethernet > devices. My first attempt did indeed use two different ports, and this > worked. I've tried two different ports with TCPBindSpecific as well, and > this did not work. The extremely confusing thing is that the setup works > fine on crystal0 and crystal1, whereas meth0 does not work, but meth1 > does. > > As for the data store locations, they are in different places, defined by > the ServerOption blocks underneath. > > Thanks! > -James > > On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Becky Ligon <[email protected]> wrote: > >> James: >> >> I took a quick look at your config file and you need to have different >> port numbers for each server on the same physical machine and separate >> storage locations for each as well. PVFS does not provide consistency >> between two servers accessing the same data locations. >> >> Becky >> -- >> Becky Ligon >> PVFS Developer >> Clemson University >> 864-656-3865 >> >> > Interesting... My knowledge of ip routing is spotty at best. I was >> under >> > the >> > impression that the network would view the second ethernet adapter as >> a >> > completely separate computer. I will try the bonding configuration. >> > Thanks! >> > >> > -James >> > >> > On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 3:17 AM, Emmanuel Florac >> > <[email protected]>wrote: >> > >> >> Le Fri, 4 Jun 2010 00:47:35 -0700 >> >> James Gao <[email protected]> écrivait: >> >> >> >> > My ultimate goal is to be able to use the full 4 gbps of bandwidth >> >> > connected to the file servers. >> >> > Any ideas? Thanks for you time! >> >> >> >> I suppose you set up your 2 different interfaces on each node in the >> >> same ip network (like 10.0.1.1 and 10.0.1.2). Unfortunately, the way >> ip >> >> routing works mean that all traffic will go through the first one. >> >> >> >> You should use bonding instead. Aggregate the two interfaces using >> >> balance-rr or balance-alb, and you'll have a virtual 2 Gb interface >> >> instead of 2 1 Gb, that should work much better. >> >> >> >> regards, >> >> -- >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique >> >> | Intellique >> >> | <[email protected]> >> >> | +33 1 78 94 84 02 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Pvfs2-users mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-users >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ Pvfs2-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-users
