Hello, thank you all for a fast reply.
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:40:23 -0400 Becky Ligon wrote: > Please try the scenario where you have 2 servers, each handling data and > metadata, no dedicated metadata server, and see if you get better > performance in the 2 server scenario. For 2 servers serving both data and metadata performance is about the same, though distribution dispersion is high: KB reclen write rewrite read reread 1024 4 6197 6400 6449 6371 1024 8 10171 10715 10577 10420 1024 16 14098 14711 18712 17967 1024 32 24087 25862 31756 31394 1024 64 37654 41712 46038 46936 1024 128 57386 64197 67032 69325 1024 256 64670 79092 4022 3969 1024 512 80214 93225 3998 3991 1024 1024 91134 102513 104098 4080 10240 4 5990 5976 5904 5941 10240 8 10448 10531 10408 10529 10240 16 14929 15087 17863 17846 10240 32 26269 26505 30825 31056 10240 64 40208 41481 45328 45401 10240 128 60009 61285 67542 66948 10240 256 77151 78960 5026 5235 10240 512 90214 91380 17142 20148 10240 1024 100260 102248 13044 9001 10240 2048 105222 108549 9187 14234 Full test results are in the attachment. Best regards, Andrew Savchenko
orangefs-benchmarks2.tar.xz
Description: Binary data
pgpgzL4gSQ8V1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Pvfs2-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-users
