Raul:

I'm not seeing any reference to OrangeFS/PVFS.  Are you sorting an
OrangeFS/PVFS file?  Does this code work correctly against the local
filesystem?

Becky


On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Kist <[email protected]> wrote:

> So, here we go:
>
> nothing on /var/log/messages, pvfs2-client.log, pvfs2-server.log.
>
> I am using the kernel module.
>
> Using 2.8.7 version.
>
> And about the strace... this client I'm using is queueing (does this word
> exist?) some HPC jobs in the cluster... it seems to prepare a python script
> to submit them, I'll try to edit the script so it includes the strace in
> the invocation. It's a little bit messy =]
>
> My output in the node is this
>
> ===========
> error in startExecution() for tool Output (2) : Function not implemented
>
>                 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>                 +++++++ Signal Handler Invoked             +++++++
>                 +++++++ Signal : SIGSEGV                   +++++++
>                 +++++++ Meaning: Invalid memory reference  +++++++
>                 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
> Stack trace is:
>
> /net/gis/tools/opencps/opencps-time-3.1-2013-06-26/bin/linux64/lib/libbluefin_tools.so:
> ogi::backtraceutil::get(int)+0x82
>
> /net/gis/tools/opencps/opencps-time-3.1-2013-06-26/bin/linux64/lib/libbluefin_tools.so:
> ogi::backtraceutil::maybePrint(std::ostream&)+0x62
>
> /net/gis/tools/opencps/opencps-time-3.1-2013-06-26/bin/linux64/lib/libopencps_engine.so:
> ogi::SignalHandling::handleSignal(int)+0x1e1
>     /lib64/libc.so.6() [0x309f032900]
>
> /net/gis/tools/opencps/opencps-time-3.1-2013-06-26/bin/linux64/lib/libopencps_engine.so:
> void std::__insertion_sort<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<long*,
> std::vector<long, std::allocator<long> > >, ogi::IndexComparator<unsigned
> long, int> >(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<long*, std::vector<long,
> std::allocator<long> > >, __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<long*,
> std::vector<long, std::allocator<long> > >, ogi::IndexComparator<unsigned
> long, int>)+0x31
>
> /net/gis/tools/opencps/opencps-time-3.1-2013-06-26/bin/linux64/lib/libopencps_engine.so:
> void std::__merge_sort_with_buffer<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<long*,
> std::vector<long, std::allocator<long> > >, long*,
> ogi::IndexComparator<unsigned long, int>
> >(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<long*, std::vector<long,
> std::allocator<long> > >, __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<long*,
> std::vector<long, std::allocator<long> > >, long*,
> ogi::IndexComparator<unsigned long, int>)+0x64
>
> /net/gis/tools/opencps/opencps-time-3.1-2013-06-26/bin/linux64/lib/libopencps_engine.so:
> void std::__stable_sort_adaptive<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<long*,
> std::vector<long, std::allocator<long> > >, long*, long,
> ogi::IndexComparator<unsigned long, int>
> >(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<long*, std::vector<long,
> std::allocator<long> > >, __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<long*,
> std::vector<long, std::allocator<long> > >, long*, long,
> ogi::IndexComparator<unsigned long, int>)+0xd3
>
> /net/gis/tools/opencps/opencps-time-3.1-2013-06-26/bin/linux64/lib/libopencps_engine.so:
> ogi::OutputMSeis::flush()+0x119
>
> /net/gis/tools/opencps/opencps-time-3.1-2013-06-26/bin/linux64/lib/libopencps_engine.so:
> ogi::OutputMSeis::finishExecution()+0x1c
>
> /net/gis/tools/opencps/opencps-time-3.1-2013-06-26/bin/linux64/lib/libbluefin_tools.so:
> ogi::Tool::finishExecutionInternal()+0x17
> ==========
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Mike Marshall <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Here is our implementation of lock in the kernel module:
>>
>> int pvfs2_lock(struct file *f, int flags, struct file_lock *lock)
>> {
>>     return -ENOSYS;
>> }
>>
>> Some things (sqllite is one I noticed) pitch a big fit if there is no
>> file lock
>> mechanism supported in the kernel...
>>
>> -Mike
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Kist <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi!!
>>>
>>> Thanks for the answers!
>>>
>>> I was just looking at the /var/log/messages, yesterday, when a small
>>> fire started in the building's energy board and we had to evacuate it.
>>> I'll have access to the cluster again tomorrow (I hope).
>>>
>>> Then I'll check for everything you suggested.
>>> Sorry for the delay.
>>> :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Sam Sampson <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> You might try running strace on the client application, and seeing what
>>>> file system call results in the error.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Sam Sampson
>>>> Omnibond Systems
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Becky Ligon <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Raul:
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you give me the exact error message that you are seeing?  Is the
>>>>> error message showing up in /var/log/messages, pvfs2-client.log,
>>>>> pvfs2-server.log, or stdout from your program?
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, are you linking the application with the pvfs2 libraries or just
>>>>> using the kernel module?
>>>>>
>>>>> Which version of OrangeFS are you using?
>>>>>
>>>>> Becky
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Rob Latham <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 03/10/2014 08:45 AM, Kist wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm testing OrangeFS (pvfs2) in a small virtual cluster before we
>>>>>>> try it
>>>>>>> on a big cluster for seismic processing.
>>>>>>> I am running 8 CentOS with 2.6 kernel. All of them are servers (io)
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> clients and the headnode is the metadata server.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So far it's the best DFS I found and our standalone tools are working
>>>>>>> alright on it but when I try to use our libraries with a different
>>>>>>> client (as a plugin in another tool) I get a "Function not
>>>>>>> implemented"
>>>>>>> error.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have no access to the source code of the client I'm using and, now,
>>>>>>> I'm looking for the pvfs2 source code for "PVFS_ENOSYS" ("Function
>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>> implemented") references but it seems a little bit more work than it
>>>>>>> should be.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, I would like to know if you guys have some ideas of what could
>>>>>>> it be
>>>>>>> (lock?) or some magic flag I can set to check what is this.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you are using the kernel interface, the one routine we've
>>>>>> explicitly disabled is fcntl() with the F_SETLKW and related flags.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> slang did this years and years ago
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.orangefs.org/fisheye/orangefs/changelog/orangefs?cs=6613
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The other thing to look at is certain kinds of mmap operations, but I
>>>>>> never, even at my peak, remembered all the various details about that 
>>>>>> one...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ==rob
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Rob Latham
>>>>>> Mathematics and Computer Science Division
>>>>>> Argonne National Lab, IL USA
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Pvfs2-users mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Becky Ligon
>>>>> OrangeFS Support and Development
>>>>> Omnibond Systems
>>>>> Anderson, South Carolina
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pvfs2-users mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pvfs2-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Raul Kist
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pvfs2-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Raul Kist
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pvfs2-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
Pvfs2-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-users

Reply via email to