Good question. I’ll ask: https://github.com/Alluxio/alluxio/pull/2818#issuecomment-289108800
Ben Emmons LSST EPO Project Manager 933 N Cherry Avenue, N508 Tucson, AZ 85721 520-318-8502 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> From: Boyd Wilson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 11:32 AM To: Ben Emmons <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Pvfs2-users] Alluxio issue with OrangeFS's LGPL license The problem with dual licensing is the number of people that have committed to the project over the years, we would have to get approval from all of the entities that committed code under LGPL and get them to agree to shift it to or add additional licenses. If they are only worried about including the JNI code, we could look at releasing that under dual license (since it is the only Java portion), do you think that would meet their needs? -b On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Ben Emmons <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: One last question: our organization has been investigating Alluxio Community Edition (https://www.alluxio.com/products) and would love to use OrangeFS over Ceph (which is supported out of the box) but the pull request providing OrangeFS integration is stalled due to Apache licensing conflicts with LGPL: https://github.com/Alluxio/alluxio/pull/2818#issuecomment-289100833 This may be a long-shot, but has the OrangeFS team considered dual-licensing or moving to a more permissive license? Ben Emmons _______________________________________________ Pvfs2-users mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-users
_______________________________________________ Pvfs2-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.beowulf-underground.org/mailman/listinfo/pvfs2-users
