Dear Mansoureh,

besides the possibility of compiling WanT within QE (make all or make want), please note that want-2.2.1 is a pretty old release...

The latest version of WanT is 2.5.1, and can be downloaded from qe-forge:

http://www.qe-forge.org/gf/download/frsrelease/153/618/want-2.5.1-base.tar.gz

(I would definitely make the upgrade)

Take care
Andrea

Dear all,
I would like to install WanT package on my PC. After ./configure and then make all I recieved following error:

/usr/include/bits/stdio.h:125:1: error: static declaration of ‘feof_unlocked’ follows non-static declaration
In file included from /usr/include/malloc.h:24:0,
                 from memstat.c:20:
/usr/include/stdio.h:836:12: note: previous declaration of ‘feof_unlocked’ was here
 extern int feof_unlocked (FILE *__stream) __THROW __wur;
            ^
In file included from /usr/include/features.h:365:0,
                 from /usr/include/malloc.h:22,
                 from memstat.c:20:
/usr/include/bits/stdio.h:132:1: error: nested function ‘ferror_unlocked’ declared ‘extern’
 __NTH (ferror_unlocked (FILE *__stream))
 ^
/usr/include/bits/stdio.h:132:1: error: static declaration of ‘ferror_unlocked’ follows non-static declaration
In file included from /usr/include/malloc.h:24:0,
                 from memstat.c:20:
/usr/include/stdio.h:837:12: note: previous declaration of ‘ferror_unlocked’ was here
 extern int ferror_unlocked (FILE *__stream) __THROW __wur;
            ^
../make.sys:16: recipe for target 'memstat.o' failed
make[1]: *** [memstat.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/root/want/want-2.1.1/ctools'
Makefile:49: recipe for target 'libctools' failed
make: *** [libctools] Error 2
 what dose it mean and how can I solve it?

Regards
Mansoureh Pashangpour
IAU
Tehran
Iran




--
Andrea Ferretti, PhD
S3 Center, Istituto Nanoscienze, CNR
via Campi 213/A, 41125, Modena, Italy
Tel: +39 059 2055322;  Skype: andrea_ferretti
URL: http://www.nano.cnr.it
_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

Reply via email to