Lex Spoon wrote:

> On the other hand, Comanche *should* be able to transfer a file at 100
> MBit/s.  If anyone has time to work on this, BufferStream looks like a
> good candidate for optimization.  For example, instead of having a single
> buffer, it could have a list of buffers and thus avoid a lot of copying.

    I'm almost sure that Andres Valloud has done something on this lines, at
least I
guess this from his mails to squeak-list.

    Guesser Bye!
    Richie++

PS: I'll try to check this out with Andres

Reply via email to