>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 09:43:32 -0400 (EDT)
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Non-member submission from 
>["Stephen Pair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
>
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Thu Aug 23 09:43:28 2001
>Received: from johnson.mail.mindspring.net 
>(johnson.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.177])
>       by burdell.cc.gatech.edu (8.9.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA16883
>       for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 09:43:26 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: from SPAIR (user-vcauh28.dsl.mindspring.com [216.175.68.72])
>       by johnson.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA11034
>       for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 09:43:25 -0400 (EDT)
>Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>From: "Stephen Pair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: [pws] CPU chowing in NT/2000
>Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 09:38:39 -0400
>Organization: Advantive Associates
>Message-ID: <00db01c12bd8$eaff8870$0c00000a@SPAIR>
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>       charset="US-ASCII"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2479.0006
>In-Reply-To: <v0421010cb7aab0c3d6ef@[130.207.3.227]>
>Importance: Normal
>
>I use Win2k, and any time a Squeak process is actively running (in a
>long running loop for example)...the performance of Windows gets
>creamed...it's hard to even get the Task Manager open to kill Squeak.  I
>don't think it's an issue with ComSwiki, Squeak just isn't giving enough
>cycles back to the OS is my guess.  You can set Squeak's priority lower,
>but that's probably not what you want to do on a server.
>
>- Stephen
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Guzdial
> > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 9:10 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [pws] CPU chowing in NT/2000
> >
> >
> > Does anybody have any clues as to what's happening with the CPU
> > getting eaten in Windows NT and Windows 2000?  I'm hearing several
> > reports about 96-100% CPU usage when Swiki is running.
> >
> > Does anyone know if that CPU usage happens when Squeak is running by
> > itself, or is it just when running ComSwiki?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >   Mark
> > --------------------------
> > Mark Guzdial : Georgia Tech : College of Computing : Atlanta,
> > GA 30332-0280 Associate Professor - Learning Sciences &
> > Technologies. Collaborative Software Lab -
> > http://coweb.cc.gatech.edu/csl/
> > (404) 894-5618 : Fax (404)
> > 894-0673 : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.cc.gatech.edu/gvu/people/Faculty> /Mark.Guzdial.html
> >

--------------------------
Mark Guzdial : Georgia Tech : College of Computing : Atlanta, GA 30332-0280
Associate Professor - Learning Sciences & Technologies.
Collaborative Software Lab - http://coweb.cc.gatech.edu/csl/
(404) 894-5618 : Fax (404) 894-0673 : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cc.gatech.edu/gvu/people/Faculty/Mark.Guzdial.html

Reply via email to