It would be wonderful if you would post this to the Swiki Swiki (on minnow). There aren't too many asking for this, so I don't think you need to spend too much time cleaning it up, but something is better than nothing.
As far as adding a dropdown "links to this page," it isn't hard. Use the SwikiBrowser to create a page action named references for your swiki. In there, put this code: book references: page before: [:results | '<form action="', (request referenceShelf: shelf book: book address: 'link'), '" method="post"> <i>links to this page:</i> <select name="name">', String crlf] during: [:element | '<option value="', (element id asString), '">', element showName, String crlf] after: [:results | '</select> <input type="submit" value="go there">', String crlf, '</form>'] ifAbsent: [''] That should pretty much do it. BTW, I recommend not doing this to the refs swiki as that one should probably be completely replace with each upgrade. Peace and Luck! Je77 On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 10:30:41AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Howdy all! > > We have just managed to whip some intelligence back into the > PWS-converter so that we can migrate our tr�s old trusty PWS Swiki with > about 650 pages to BigTime instead. It's about time, wouldn't you say? > :-) He, that old dog still runs on a Linux Squeak2.3 VM... > > We also added generation of the referenceCache (turned the script into a > two-pass variant) so that we can migrate into a docs-swiki if we like. > And of course, full history is preserved (as was also implemented in the > old script). > > Question: How would we go about adding a "links to this page" dropdown > menu like the one on minnow (Squeak wiki)? I could probably figure it > out myself but wanted to check first if there are any traps ahead. > > We also noticed that the formatter adds <br>s even if it is inside a > table-tag etc. which messes up some of our old pages using tables, we > might try to fix that. > > regards, G�ran > > PS. If someone is interested in our spiffed up version of the PWS > converter, post and I will see if popular demand can bring us to clean > the code up a bit and post it... ;-) DS
