Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote: > Execnet is using only marshal, afaik. However, it should be possible to > be at least a bit more informative and give RemoteError a name attribute > or so that gives the name of the remote exception class. Just giving > some message with traceback and everything makes it annoying to do > anything with the exception object programmatically. > > Yes, I agree... Although I still think it's not easy to find a good way to send all the information (exception instance + traceback would be nice obviously) back over the channel, it would certainly be useful to do the minimal (set seperate instance name + message on the RemoteError instance for instance) compared to having a single explanation string...
Cheers, Guido _______________________________________________ py-dev mailing list py-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/py-dev
