On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 21:16 +1000, Gordon Wrigley wrote: > > yes, might make sense then. I attached a working example > > how to do general output redirection, maybe that helps you. > > I gave the example a look over and it all makes sense and is nice and > straight forward. So far I've maintained a 1 to 1 relation ship > between threads and channels, in the context of the example are there > any threading implications to having multiple threads calling into the > channel file that has been assigned to sys.stdout?
no problems i am aware off. It *should* be safe to have multiple threads using channel.send() concurrently. It depends on write()s to pipes (or sockets) being atomic eventually which i think they are. One issue that can pop up is tearing down the whole machinery cleanly - that can sometimes be more involved and i believe execnet still might need some more work there. holger -- Metaprogramming, Python, Testing: http://tetamap.wordpress.com Python, PyPy, pytest contracting: http://merlinux.eu _______________________________________________ py-dev mailing list py-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/py-dev
