On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 18:23 +1000, James Mills wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 6:15 PM, meme dough <memedo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I have written a new pytest coverage plugin from the ground up to > > fully support distributed testing since both pytest and coverage > > provide good support for doing this. Plus it gives access to pretty > > much everything that coverage has that I know about. > > Do you have a link to this at all ? > Do you intend to maintain and support this new plugin ? > > I'm happy to drop the one I maintain on bitbucket in favor of yours if need > be.
Let's discuss and review things when they are there. > > I had not thought of the case you suggest where it may be desirable to > > instruct the plugin to actually combine the results from each slave > > where each slave has run all tests. > > > > I will consider this further. > > Please do as this is an important use-case ihmo (and others agree). I often run tests on multiple platforms and i'd appreciate a combined coverage report. Moreover, i'd like to see how to then only report skips when they were skipped on all platforms. This way it'd be easy to identify which platform/interpreter is missing in the testing mix by looking at remaining skips. cheers, holger > (Maybe not for distributed testing, but certainly for testing a library > against more than one supported version of python). > > Look forward to using your work, > > cheers > James > _______________________________________________ > py-dev mailing list > py-dev@codespeak.net > http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/py-dev -- _______________________________________________ py-dev mailing list py-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/py-dev
