Hi Meme, well, i'd rather like to see the two coverage approaches / features merge into a single good coverage plugin with tests. For my use cases both don't work completely well ;)
holger On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:16 -0000, issues-nore...@bitbucket.org wrote: > --- you can reply above this line --- > > New issue 101: Add pytest-cov to plugins page? > http://bitbucket.org/hpk42/py-trunk/issue/101/add-pytest-cov-to-plugins-page > > memedough on Tue, 25 May 2010 12:16:58 +0200: > > Description: > Hi, > > Would you be agreeable to adding pytest-cov to the plugins page? I've been > using it for a while now and it's performing well and stable for my usage > pattern. It provides another option and may be useful for others. > > :) > > > Responsible: > hpk42 > -- > This is an issue notification from bitbucket.org. > You are receiving this either because you are the > owner of the issue, or you are following the issue. > _______________________________________________ > py-dev mailing list > py-dev@codespeak.net > http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/py-dev > -- _______________________________________________ py-dev mailing list py-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/py-dev
