Hi Only providing feedback on the naming issues so far. After some usage of this API I have changed my mind slightly on these.
On 18 September 2012 14:14, holger krekel <hol...@merlinux.eu> wrote: > - rename @pytest.setup to @pytest.fixture +1 > - rename @pytest.factory to @pytest.funcarg I would rather like to keep @pytest.factory. While writing plugin code I find it much clearer thinking about a resource rather then a funcarg. And @factory is short for "resource factory" so that works. I think consistently using the name resource in the documentation and only mention pytest_funcarg__foo as a legacy aproach will be clearer. I think it is also clearer to explain a resource and a fixture next to each other, while for a funcarg the explanation would become longer. Lastly I'd probably vote for "testcontext" as name for the funcarg currently provided by "request". This is a bit more annoying to type but less likely to conflict with user provided resources. Thanks for all the work this, and for putting up with all my requests and questions. Floris _______________________________________________ py-dev mailing list py-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/py-dev
