On Wednesday 02 November 2005 17:12, James Bunton wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> PyMSNt 0.10.2 has been released. This release just has a few critical
> fixes, and is recommended for all users of 0.10.x
> http://msn-transport.jabberstudio.org
> Please remember to read through the documentation on that page. As
> always, feedback on the program and docs are welcome.

Just one minor issue here: the new version requires you to be in the install 
directory to run it.  This is a regression from the old version which handled 
directories properly no matter which directory you were in when you ran it.

Hacking the script to chdir to the correct spot was simple enough, though.

TX

-- 
             Email: Trejkaz Xaoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
          Web site: http://trypticon.org/
         Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   GPG Fingerprint: 9EEB 97D7 8F7B 7977 F39F  A62C B8C7 BC8B 037E EA73
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 
http://modevia.com/pipermail/py-transports/attachments/20051102/aec027f6/attachment.pgp
From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Wed Nov  2 09:35:40 2005
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Bunton)
Date: Wed Nov  2 09:35:45 2005
Subject: [py-transports] Re: [jadmin] PyMSNt 0.10.2 released
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

On 02/11/2005, at 7:24 PM, Trejkaz wrote:

> On Wednesday 02 November 2005 17:12, James Bunton wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> PyMSNt 0.10.2 has been released. This release just has a few critical
>> fixes, and is recommended for all users of 0.10.x
>> http://msn-transport.jabberstudio.org
>> Please remember to read through the documentation on that page. As
>> always, feedback on the program and docs are welcome.
>
> Just one minor issue here: the new version requires you to be in the 
> install
> directory to run it.  This is a regression from the old version which 
> handled
> directories properly no matter which directory you were in when you 
> ran it.
>
> Hacking the script to chdir to the correct spot was simple enough, 
> though.
>
> TX

Will fix :P

---

James

Reply via email to