Op donderdag 15 september 2005 21:36, schreef Gonzalo Barrio: > Pedro, how many concurrent users have in sapo ? > Are you using this clustering feature ? > What hard and soft ? > I mean msn1, msn2, msn3 ...... all reponding msn.im.sapo.com.pt, because > I think that I can add this feature on jabberd2 modifying some things on > the router and sm component. In this way, we can clusterize all kind of > components (except mu-conference I think again) > Then only thing I don't want to do is to reinvent the weel..... :-)
I posted about Candygram on this list a week ago. Maybe that is even better :) <snip> -- Mvg, Sander Devrieze. xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( http://jabber.tk/ ) From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 15 20:37:28 2005 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gonzalo Barrio) Date: Thu Sep 15 20:37:38 2005 Subject: [py-transports] PyMSNt 0.10-rc3 In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> What about performance of using this candygram "process" or "threads" comunicating eachother, this is better than using native python threads? thanks. Sander Devrieze wrote: >Op donderdag 15 september 2005 21:36, schreef Gonzalo Barrio: > > >>Pedro, how many concurrent users have in sapo ? >>Are you using this clustering feature ? >>What hard and soft ? >>I mean msn1, msn2, msn3 ...... all reponding msn.im.sapo.com.pt, because >>I think that I can add this feature on jabberd2 modifying some things on >>the router and sm component. In this way, we can clusterize all kind of >>components (except mu-conference I think again) >>Then only thing I don't want to do is to reinvent the weel..... :-) >> >> > >I posted about Candygram on this list a week ago. Maybe that is even better :) > ><snip> > > >
