Sorry for the confusion, OPN (www.antepo.com) AOL Clients using the official AIM client are the ones that seem to see the small blue italicized text. I will see if I can get a screenshot for you.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Henninger Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 10:42 AM To: PyAIM-t/PyICQ-t/PyMSN-t Discussion Subject: Re: [py-transports] PyAIMt OPN? =) When you say legit AOL clients, do you mean those using the official AIM client, or those not only using the official AIM client, but also using AOL "as a whole". (the service or whatever you'd call it) I have no way of testing the AOL "as a whole" service, but there shouldn't be any reason why it doesn't come through correctly based off PyAIM's code. (simply because it never ever references italics, blue, or any type of font really. =/ I can't imagine what else would cause it. Does anyone happen to have a screenshot of this behavior so that I can look and see if I notice anything unusual? Daniel On Jan 5, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Parish, Ray wrote: > The only reports I have heard are from legit AOL clients. If other aim > users are using Trillian or someother IM Client, the font comes > over as > it should. > > More info on our environment: > > We are using OPN Server client 4.5 sp1. The OPN server talks to our > jabber 1.4.4 server to access the gateways. > We only transitioned from the old c transport because the process > would > die several times a day. We switched to the PyAIMt and it has been > running solid for over a week with no problems. > > > Thanks > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel > Henninger > Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 9:07 AM > To: PyAIM-t/PyICQ-t/PyMSN-t Discussion > Subject: Re: [py-transports] PyAIMt > > Say -what-? Ack! The default handling of text in PyAIM is to be > simple "black text on white background"... nothing special about it. > If your Jabber client is providing XHTML, then I tried to pass that > on if I can. All I can think of is that either: > > A. The person on the other end has something configured poorly in > their AIM client > B. The jabber client is set to be small blue italicized > > I can't imagine where else this would be coming from! =/ Anyone > else seen this before? > > Daniel > > On Jan 5, 2006, at 8:56 AM, Parish, Ray wrote: > >> Sorry if this has been covered before, I just transitioned from the >> old aim c transport to the new Python AIM. >> >> Very stable compared to the old c transport, thanks guys. >> >> >> >> PyAIMt-0.7b version >> >> >> >> I am getting reports that when a user uses the PyAIMt transport to >> communicate to an AIM client (legit download client) the font is >> seen to the AIM client as small blue italicized font. >> >> >> >> Any fix? >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> py-transports mailing list >> py-transports@blathersource.org >> http://www.modevia.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/py-transports > > _______________________________________________ > py-transports mailing list > py-transports@blathersource.org > http://www.modevia.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/py-transports > _______________________________________________ > py-transports mailing list > py-transports@blathersource.org > http://www.modevia.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/py-transports > > _______________________________________________ py-transports mailing list py-transports@blathersource.org http://www.modevia.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/py-transports From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 5 21:50:41 2006 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Laur) Date: Thu Jan 5 21:57:16 2006 Subject: [py-transports] PyAIM-t Avatar Support Not fully functional? Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Is there something obvious that I am missing with getting AIM buddy icon/Jabber Avatar support going properly in 0.7b? I have python-imaging installed, but only a few of the contacts on my AIM buddy list have icons that show up properly. The rest all have a generic icon (The AIM guy with the jabber light bulbs icon). The icons for these contacts appear fine using gaim, trillian, etc. Sorry for the generic question with no debugging info. I ran with -d and -D to see if I could find anything. It appears the icons are being requested but some are returning len 0.. Maybe the requests are being sent at times when clients will refuse to send icons? Thanks for any suggestions, John Laur
