On 3/3/06, Maarten Fonville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> > Any idea how can I make it works?
>
> You need to 'hack' avatar support into jabberd2
>
> See this bug: http://j2.openaether.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29

Worked fine!!! \o/

Just one more question. People that uses JAJC, updated their vcard
adding the avatar and all worked fine, but, pandion 2.5 seems to don't
have support to avatar on vcard, is it correct?

If yes, is there another "cool" Free client for windows?

Thanks
--
Renato Botelho
From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Fri Mar  3 17:18:50 2006
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Oleg Motienko)
Date: Fri Mar  3 17:18:53 2006
Subject: [py-transports] JID Migration
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Ok, I'll try to make separate tool for adding contacts from spool.
(Now I think it must be done manually only once then migrating spool
from JIT)

On 3/3/06, Daniel Henninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reason why I haven't "just implemented this" is because I have
> run into numerous occasions where too much syncing just aggravates
> me.  For example, I might do this:
>
> 1. Log into ICQ via gaim, remove 3 people
> 2. Log into ICQ via PyICQ, PyICQ has those contacts and puts them back
> 3. Log into ICQ via real ICQ, remove 3 poeple
> 4. Log into ICQ via some other client, it does the same sync thing
> ICQ does and puts them back
>
> You see my issue with that?  Trying to figure out a proper sync there
> is going to be tricky.  However, I think I have a simply idea that
> should so it.  All I really need is some sort of flag to add to the
> spool to say "I've seen this contact before".  Then, if importing
> from JIT, the flag won't exist and I can say "hrm, need to put this
> contact on the SSI", flag it in the spool.  Whenever I add a contact
> directly, I'll just go ahead and put the flag so I don't start trying
> to put stuff back all the time.  Anyway, it's a delicate dance that I
> was making sure to spend some time to think through before "just
> doing".  Contacts reappearing is one of the things that gets on my
> nerves the most.  ;D   You did file a bug report so it hasn't flown
> off my radar.  ;D  Can anyone see any fault in this idea for doing
> the syncing?


Another thing I notice is a difference in subscription. If I add
contact in JIT I'll can see his status even if I'm not authorized.
It's not proper but important factor for some users.

Yet another thing is detecting IP address and client version of ICQ
contact. I wrote patches for PyICQ but it's seems they are removed
from latest svn.

And the last (I hope) is local loop for stranzas if one PyICQt user
send it to another via ICQ. In other words some stranzas goes through
local loop not through twisted/oscar. It saves network traffic and
processor time :) Latest release of JIT has such feature.

--
Regards,
Oleg
From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Fri Mar  3 17:34:53 2006
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel Henninger)
Date: Fri Mar  3 17:34:08 2006
Subject: [py-transports] JID Migration
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Another thing I notice is a difference in subscription. If I add
> contact in JIT I'll can see his status even if I'm not authorized.
> It's not proper but important factor for some users.

I'm not sure I follow.  If you add a user in ICQ land and they  
haven't authorized you, you -shouldn't- see them.  Am I missing  
something?

> Yet another thing is detecting IP address and client version of ICQ
> contact. I wrote patches for PyICQ but it's seems they are removed
> from latest svn.

I didn't "remove" anything like that, so if that's the case then it's  
just that something is buggy.  I still see the parts that are  
supposed to detect those pieces.  I haven't tested that though.   
Please file a bug report.

> And the last (I hope) is local loop for stranzas if one PyICQt user
> send it to another via ICQ. In other words some stranzas goes through
> local loop not through twisted/oscar. It saves network traffic and
> processor time :) Latest release of JIT has such feature.

Is there a feature request posted for this?  (I'll never remember  
these things if folk don't post bug reports/feature requests  ;)  My  
mind is always in too many places at the same time)  I know there's a  
request for some form of this but I'm not entirely sure it's exactly  
the same thing.  The one that currently exists is more of a "if two  
people are using PyICQ, send something along the ICQ stream to say  
"hey, I like jabber, use jabber".

Daniel


>
> --
> Regards,
> Oleg
> _______________________________________________
> py-transports mailing list
> py-transports@blathersource.org
> http://www.modevia.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/py-transports

Reply via email to