On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Roman Mindalev<[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:02:48 +0200 > Fabio Forno <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I've hooked a stop method in the connectionLost method and >> here are the results, after few days of testing: >> - patched gw (aim): 27MB of memory (stable after the first day) >> - non patched gq (icq): 89MB of memory (steadily increasing) > Looks interesting. You have many users online?
More or less the same in both transports no more then 10-15 online at the same moment. Since the last mail the patched gw keep 27MB of RAM, while the other jumped to 98MB >> If you like I'll be happy to share patches > Of course, memory consumption it's own problem #1. Do you prefer in the ML or privately? (my jid is the sign if you need it) -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: [email protected] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "py-transports" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/py-transports?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
