On Samstag 21 Februar 2009, Nicholas S-A wrote: > The only problem is that I am printing status information, and > prepared_async_call() doesn't actually return a zero-tuple as far as I > can tell. Is this improved in 0.92? I am currently running 0.91 and > don't want to go through more upgrade headache if it isn't going to add > anything for me ;)
Whoops, that was a doc bug in prepared_async_call. It's supposed to return None. (And that is and has been the behavior of the code.) If you want the timing function that the docs used to promise--that's what prepared_timed_call() is for. :) That had a doc bug, too--it doesn't take a 'stream' parameter. (If you need timing *and* streams, you can easily build that yourself from Events and prepared_async_call--look at the implementation to see how it's done.) I've fixed all the doc bugs. Regarding fear of upgrades: Use a disposable virtualenv. Andreas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ PyCuda mailing list PyCuda@tiker.net http://tiker.net/mailman/listinfo/pycuda_tiker.net
