Hello Tomasz,

Against which commit have you diffed your patch? I was going to run it
on Tesla 2050 (test_gpuarray.py is enough, right?) but I am having
problems trying to apply it.

Best regards,
Bogdan

On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Tomasz Rybak <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello.
> I have been trying to finally fix problem with CURAND 4 wrapper.
> I am sending patch adding classes wrapping generators added in CURAND 4,
> i.e. Sobol64 and ScrambledSobol{32, 64}.
> I have fixed warnings related to block size in prepare_call.
>
> I have also tried to fix problem with lack of resources
> when creating Sobol64 classes. I have decided to decrease number
> of threads in constructor for both 1.x and 2.x devices.
> Unfortunately currently I have access to ION (1.1 device),
> so I cannot test it on Fermi device - can someone test
> it on Tesla C20x0 or GeForce 4x0 or 5x0?
>
> If this patch is OK, then the only missing part of CURAND 4
> will be log_* generators.
>
> Best regards.
>
>
> --
> Tomasz Rybak <[email protected]> GPG/PGP key ID: 2AD5 9860
> Fingerprint A481 824E 7DD3 9C0E C40A  488E C654 FB33 2AD5 9860
> http://member.acm.org/~tomaszrybak
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PyCUDA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.tiker.net/listinfo/pycuda
>
>

_______________________________________________
PyCUDA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.tiker.net/listinfo/pycuda

Reply via email to