The following forum message was posted by rsflux at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/pydev/forums/forum/293649/topic/4052665:
I am curious if there is any support for exceptions to the static analyzer for
metaclasses. I have some code that looks like the following:
[code]class MetaClass(type):
def __call__(cls, *args, **kwargs):
pass[/code]
PyDev highlights __call__ with an error of "should have self as first
parameter.",
but that is not the general "pythonic" pattern followed with metaclasses. I
know that I can #@NoSelf the line, but that creates extra clutter that I would
like to avoid.
Does PyDev have any support for different rulesets with metaclasses? If the
static analyzer is not able to determine what classes are actually metaclasses,
I would find marking up the class definition with an #@IsMetaclass comment
preferable
to #@NoSelf'ing each method definition. Would this be a reasonable solution?
-Ryan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks
Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand
malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you
can protect your company and customers by using code signing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
Pydev-users mailing list
Pydev-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pydev-users
