On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:18 AM, anatoly techtonik <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Paul Boddie <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tuesday 19. November 2013 15.58.15 M.-A. Lemburg wrote: >>> On 19.11.2013 15:38, Alexandro Colorado wrote: >>> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:29 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> On 19.11.2013 14:46, anatoly techtonik wrote: >>> >>> wiki.python.org doesn't allow the word "hardcore" in contents, >>> >>> which is a bad filter choice, because, well, some talks about >>> >>> Python internals are hardcore for the most users out there. >>> >>> >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardcore >>> >>> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=hardcore >>> >> >>> >> I've made the filter more selective. >> >> Of course, the need to use "hardcore" frequently in a reference like the >> Python Wiki is somewhat debatable. :-) > > Well, I guess who writes the most - wins. =) There is still a long way to go > before Python Wiki can experience Wikipedia-like edit wars. > >> what occurs when no such measures are in place. I would argue that anti-spam >> measures need to be a bit more varied these days, though, and I've written >> about that on this list in the recent past, I believe. > > MoinMoin is not interesting. Everybody is using MediaWiki. Is there > anything else, more advanced on the horizon?
I don't know what makes MoinMoin "not interesting", and your second sentence is surely false. If you're suggesting a move away from MoinMoin, you have a lot of work to do. _______________________________________________ pydotorg-www mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pydotorg-www
