Thanks Freddie, once more, :). Btw, just curiosity, at the solution points, Do you store primitive variables, or conserved Variables x JacDet Value (i.e. u or bar_u as indicated in some papers)?
Cheers, Antonio On Thursday, October 23, 2014 9:44:45 AM UTC+2, Freddie Witherden wrote: > > On 23/10/2014 07:39, Antonio Garcia-Uceda wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > Thanks for the reply. Could you please indicate why exactly pyFR does > > not have local dt for steady state solutions? I mean, is there any > > constraint in FR different from the normal local dt used in FV? > > There is no technical reason why one could not go ahead and implement > local time stepping into PyFR. However, as I said in my previous > e-mail, if you're interested in steady state solutions to the > Navier-Stokes equation there are more suitable tools and algorithms. > > Regards, Freddie. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PyFR Mailing List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyfrmailinglist. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
