Dear Freddie, Thank you very much for the reference. As I see the only time you utilise the Determinant of the Jacobian is when updating the solution in time. In the extrapolation to Face Flux points it does not intervene, right?
Best regards, Antonio On Monday, October 27, 2014 11:47:51 AM UTC+1, Freddie Witherden wrote: > > On 27/10/14 09:13, Antonio Garcia-Uceda wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > My name is Antonio Garcia-Uceda, and I'm working on Flux Reconstruction. > > I have the following question: > > > > In pyFR, when we extrapolate the solution from Solution Points in Cells > > to Flux Points on Faces, Is this carried out over primitive variables > > (rho, u, v, w, p) or conserved variables (rho, rhou, rhov, rhow, rhoE)? > > In the second case, Are this variables also multiplied by the > > Determinant of the Jacobian computed at the solution point, i.e. bar > > state is indicated in FR literature (Jrho, Jrhou, Jrhov, Jrhow, JrhoE)? > > PyFR works exclusively in terms of conservative variables. Details on > the transformations can be found in our paper > > http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010465514002549 > > specifically equations 6, 12, 10, and 11. > > Regards, Freddie. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PyFR Mailing List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyfrmailinglist. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
