Thanks a lot Freddie, I should keep trying with ATLAS then. Did you download yours from the same source?
Best regards, Antonio On Monday, October 19, 2015 at 12:32:54 PM UTC+2, Antonio Garcia-Uceda wrote: > > Dear All, > > My name is Antonio Garcia-Uceda, and I'm working on Flux Reconstruction. > > Could you please let me know which BLAS-type library do you use with PyFR? > And according to your experience, Which one offers the best performance? > > In my experience, OpenBLAS library is more efficient in my machine LINUX > _86 (64 bits), followed very closely by intel MKL. However I'm testing them > in different architectures. > > I wanted to test ATLAS-BLAS library from > http://math-atlas.sourceforge.net/. However I get compilation issues: the > library seems to compiles fine but it fails in the linkage process ( > > *undefined reference to cblas_dgemm...).*Could you please tell me whether > you've also tested the ATLAS-BLAS library, whether from the same source, > and whether you came across similar issues? > > Thanks a lot in advance. > > Best regards, > Antonio > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PyFR Mailing List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyfrmailinglist. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
