Hi Ray, How did it fail? What Mach numbers were you trying?
We have run cases with relatively low Mach numbers (<2) with PyFR using artificial viscosity (see the User Guide): * shock-capturing — shock capturing scheme: none | artificial-viscosity Cheers Peter Dr Peter Vincent MSci ARCS DIC PhD Reader in Aeronautics and EPSRC Fellow Department of Aeronautics Imperial College London South Kensington London SW7 2AZ UK web: www.imperial.ac.uk/aeronautics/research/vincentlab<http://www.imperial.ac.uk/aeronautics/research/vincentlab> twitter: @Vincent_Lab<https://twitter.com/Vincent_Lab> On 7 Dec 2016, at 12:21, Ray <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Dear all, I've tried a few of supersonic cases and failed each time. And there's no supersonic cases in published posts. I'm wondering if PyFR is suitable for supersonic cases in normal working condition? Best regards, Ray -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PyFR Mailing List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/pyfrmailinglist. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PyFR Mailing List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/pyfrmailinglist. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
