No, I haven't tried that. Do you think laptop hard drives would keep up? Anyway, I'm down to a ceiling of ~42 Mb RAM total (~14 Mb loaded images), so I'm not as concerned about this as I was a couple weeks ago. I need to start refocusing on the features :-)
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 12:38:39 +0930, "Tim Ansell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Hello, > > Out of interest, have you tried loading the images on demand? > > I have found that computers and hard drives are fast enough these days > to load the images as needed (as long as the animation doesn't run to > fast). This way you may only keep 3-4 frames at one time. > > Another option is to use something like PIL and Gif animations, this > allows you to "seek" through the file and only load the images as > needed. > > Hope this helps. > > Mithro > > > On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 15:02 -0400, David Mikesell wrote: > > And once again without the line wrapping... > > > <snip very interesting article> >
