Jakub Piotr Cłapa wrote: >>> That's the reason why restricted execution was withdrawn from the >>> stdlib. Nobody seems to care about security enught to handle this >>> (rather difficult) problem.
> Greg Ewing wrote: >> That's not entirely true -- there are efforts underway to >> come up with a new model for sandboxed execution. It'll probably >> be a while before anything usable comes out of that, though. Ethan Glasser-Camp wrote: > Where can I find information on these efforts? Still working on security http://sayspy.blogspot.com/2006/07/still-working-on-security.html Securing Python http://svn.python.org/view/*checkout*/python/branches/bcannon-sandboxing/securing_python.txt?rev=50717 -- Nicola Larosa - http://www.tekNico.net/ I'm creating things now that I want to be able to read, hear, watch, search, and filter 50 years from now. Despite all their emphasis on con- tent creators, Apple has made it clear that they do not share this goal. Openness is not a cargo cult. Some get it, some don't. Apple doesn't. -- Mark Pilgrim, June 2006
