cool. Those are good ones. I guess the goal is a traditional glossary. here's one definition I found which seems good:
"Short list of words related to a specific topic, with brief definitions, arranged alphabetically and often placed at the end of a book." Links to pygame documentation on parts would be good, rather than external links. If each part needs it's own wiki page with a longer description, then that would be good to add. I guess links to Wikipedia would be ok too. But the main focus should be short descriptions of weird terms. I tried a few different ways of using html, but I think your layout was better. I don't know of an easier way of making paragraphs. On 8/17/07, Ethan Glasser-Camp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > René Dudfield wrote: > > So far it only describes what 'Dirty Rects' are. But over time it > > should include any term that's used in pygame. > > I've added some terms. What's the overall goal? In an ordinary wiki we > would make lots of little pages and link them to one another. Should > we do that here too? Should we refer to Wikipedia as necessary? > > Also, is there an easy way to make multiple paragraphs without using > <p>HTML</p>? > > Ethan > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFGxOcQhRlgoLPrRPwRAiTLAJ9DpsJzaWMOAIdhFrJGXpW3KbsYYwCfQjbf > F7mM/jWPdJHgN57TuQMWNbk= > =XB/k > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
