Yeah I did it another way, I divided by 2 instead, it was much clearer to me then.
On 9/22/07, R. Alan Monroe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Okay I took your idea Alan and I finally got the outcome that I wanted. > > Thanks. > > Not sure you "got" what I meant :) > > If you divide the mouse coordinate by 100, you'll automatically either > get a 0, 1, or 2 as the result. No need for any kind of "in > range(0,50)" comparison at all. > > Alan > >
