is this going to consider tools/utilities that allow u to create games/apps using pygame ?
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:31 AM, claudio canepa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> Richard and I have been working on setting up a web site >> for the Pyggy Awards, and it's very nearly ready to go! >> >> In case you've forgotten, the Pyggy Awards is going to be >> a showcase event for games based on a previous PyWeek entry. >> If you want to polish one of your PyWeek games and have >> somewhere to show off the result, this is it. >> >> The Pyggy Awards will be run in a very similar way to >> the PyWeek competition, with the following differences: >> >> * You can start working immediately, or even in the past, >> i.e. any further work you've already done on an existing >> PyWeek entry is eligible. >> >> * Any library code can be used, as long as it's open >> source. >> >> The only thing remaining to be decided is the dates for >> the judging period. The possibilities are: >> >> a) Early December, probably the first 2 weeks. >> >> b) Some time in February or March next year. >> >> Option (b) obviously allows more coding time, but the >> next PyWeek is going to be in early April, so it wouldn't >> leave much time for people to recover their energy. >> >> So I'm asking for feedback on this -- what would you >> prefer? More time, or more breathing space before the >> next PyWeek? >> >> -- >> Greg >> > I think december is better, but can use either. > Greg, in your response to Charlie you seem to _allow_ older games, but the > page you point in the first post tells _previus pyweek_ . Update the page ? > Glad libraries restriction dropped, this will allow to grow libraries along > the game refactor. > -- > claxo > > -- Rita Rudner - "I wonder if other dogs think poodles are members of a weird religious cult."
