A piece of SDL_pie ? Pyg pie. Pee why game? Not too much for a pygmy. Well... maybe sdl_pygame is good... and keep the functions pyg_ ?
hehe, I'm not too sure. On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Marcus von Appen <[email protected]> wrote: > On, Thu Feb 12, 2009, Rene Dudfield wrote: > >> eg. sdl_pyg libSDL_pygXXX and pyg_XXX ? > > I gave that a second thought - SDL_pyg could be pronounced 'SDL_pig'. Do > we really want that? :-D > > > [...] >> I think we should wait until after pygame 1.9 is released before >> moving it over to use SDL_pyg? Was that your idea too? Or start >> right away? I think I'd like to wait until after... too keep the 1.9 > > A small addition to my other answer: > > I more thought of keeping two codebases, one within pygame, one for the > SDL C library (as written in my response to Petes mail). Regarding > pygame 1.9 I cannot give you any advice. As you already might have seen, > my focus is to stabilise pgreloaded and make it ready for an alpha > release :-). > >> release complexity down (it already has *heaps* of changes). But >> maybe we can start right away? > > I would not recommend that. Some internals changed within the code used > by pgreloaded (and thus the SDL C library). The good news are that the > API is pretty clean now, the bad however that it might behave a bit > differently in some cases. This needs thorough testing. > > Reegards > Marcus >
