I appreciate clarifying the situation. I noticed on other pages that GSoc usually doesn't allow documentation projects.A whole documentation system.. however...that's interesting and definitely worth writing a proposal about. John p.s. Has anyone built pgreloaded from source in Windows Vista yet?I have had some problems getting it to build correctly last night.I'll send a more detailed email about the problems when I get home from school.
-----Original Message----- From: Marcus von Appen <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:47:06 +0100 Subject: Re: [pygame] gsoc pygame more ideas On, Thu Mar 19, 2009, Rene Dudfield wrote: > Hey, > > just a note. GSOC doesn't like to accept documentation projects - > they want code projects. The focus would be on the creation of an easy to use documentation system, such as the XML -> RST <-> text transformations, improved automated doc stub generation for new or changed contents. The documentation itself and intro would be for pure demonstrative puposes, so to speak :-). One problem I run into with the docs is that I'm too lazy to write different docs for both, the python modules and the user, but want to have the user documentation as nice and feature-rich as possible, while the python documentation should focus on the technical aspects (argument usage, return values, etc.), which is the background for that task and - in my opinion - makes it suitable for the GSoC. Regards Marcus
