Well I don't really *need* the __dict__ functionality, but it would be *convenient* to have *and it is included* in the official documentation.
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 2:44 AM, Martti Kühne <mysat...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Ian Mallett <i...@geometrian.com> wrote: > > As a sidenote, I haven't ever had occasion to use this functionality, as > > there are more idiomatic and clear ways to retrieve information about > > events' data. > > > > > This really is the key point here. Looking at events, you first check > ev.type and will do different things based on the type anyway. And if > you need to debug things, the respective string representation, str() > and repr() both appear to boil down to the same, really informative > result. > > cheers! > mar77i >
