On 19 April 2017 at 07:28, DiliupG <dili...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is a good point for us to pivot in the direction of sdl2 permanently > for the sake of the future. Is it really difficult to do that? > Rene, Thomas what about it?
There's ongoing work on supporting SDL 2 being discussed in another thread (though I'm not involved in it, to be clear). Hopefully it won't be too difficult, but it's not totally straightforward either. Thomas
