On Dec 27, 2007 12:56 AM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, keeping 2.4/2.5 compatibility is pretty simple; the only issues > > I've had are avoiding decorators. > > Decorators? Stuff like @classmethod? This works in 2.4.
*Hits head*. > So I assume you are going to support python2.4 for some time? I see no reason to deprecate 2.4 support just for 2.5 features (since I apparently don't even know what these are...). However, when pyglet begins moving to 2.6/3.0, support for both 2.4 and 2.5 will need to be dropped. Mostly this is due to the change in strings, which pyglet currently uses as byte arrays. More decisions on the whether and when of this are postponed until 2.6 is available. Alex. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pyglet-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
