On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Casey Duncan <[email protected]> wrote: [..] > > I'm +0 on this, it does make the code more pep-8 compliant, so that's > a plus. I could care less about stupid broken tools.
Actually to be more explicit: I'm -1 on making this change to 1.1, it seems like needless code churn for nominal gain. I'm +0 for making this change for 1.2. I can take it or leave it. -Casey -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pyglet-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users?hl=en.
