On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 8:25 AM, greenmoss <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is there any chance the ctypes-only clone will be integrated before a > pyglet 1.2 release, or for that matter "any time soon"? FWIW, I tried > the clone, and it was acting a bit "weird" for me. My $0.000002 on that would be that if tests show it clearly works better on at least one configuration we want to support, we should seriously consider integrating it. I have not looked inside it, but it seems like we could add an option to use it, and the messiness would show up either as a lot of tests for that option, or a lot of duplicated code (if the modules that otherwise would have all those tests would have two variants instead). Further, we might not be able to have a perfect automated choice for how to set the option. But either of those situations seems better to me than just not working well on some important system configuration. But until more test results are in, it's hard to discuss this concretely. Also it might be helpful if you would elaborate a bit on "acting a bit weird" :-) - Bruce Smith -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pyglet-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users?hl=en.
